Most growing businesses assume their cloud backups are ready for emergencies. When disaster strikes, many find those backups fail to restore systems quickly enough to prevent weeks of downtime.
The gap between backup and recovery
A fintech company faced this reality a few years ago. After losing one of its cloud environments, the team expected recovery within hours. The process instead stretched into weeks.
The issue wasn’t the backups. The company had set them up correctly—or so it believed. What it lacked was a tested recovery process to confirm the backups could rebuild systems and restore current data. Adam Gallant, project lead at KineticSkunk, explained the distinction: “Backups aren’t the final goal. You need proof they can be restored, and that what you’ve saved is the latest version of your data and application.”
Related: Power overtakes fibre in data centres
The distinction is easily overlooked. When systems run smoothly, backups operate unseen. Problems only appear under pressure—when a system crashes or an auditor requests validated recovery metrics. At that point, businesses need more than backup files. They require evidence their systems can be rebuilt within an acceptable timeframe and that the recovered data meets the organisation’s recovery point objectives.
The risk is highest for scaling fintechs and engineering-led SMEs in regulated industries. These companies are often expected to provide disaster recovery documentation and tested recovery time objectives, but their teams prioritize growth over resilience. Gallant noted that early-stage companies focus on building applications, moving to the cloud, and acquiring customers. Disaster recovery often becomes an afterthought.
How cloud complexity worsens the problem
Cloud platforms have made enterprise-grade infrastructure accessible. A South African fintech can now deploy services at speeds that once required far more resources. The trade-off is increased complexity.
As businesses grow, their cloud environments expand. Teams add services incrementally, solving immediate problems without revisiting older setups. Over time, backup processes can become a routine task—something configured once and ignored. Responsibility for resilience spreads across teams, with no clear ownership for testing recovery.
Related: Backlash grows, China narrows US lead, IBM falls
Uptime Institute’s 2025 outage analysis revealed that nearly 40% of organizations had experienced a major outage caused by human error in the previous three years. Of those incidents, 85% were tied to staff failing to follow procedures or flaws in the procedures themselves.
This operational gap remains widespread. Technology advances rapidly, and competitive pressure rewards businesses that move quickly. Environments evolve incrementally, with different services added to solve immediate problems and responsibility distributed across teams. Backup can gradually turn into a checkbox rather than an actively tested business capability.
KineticSkunk’s Store, Protect & Prove service has been designed to address this gap.
For southern African SMEs, cyber threats are rising. INTERPOL’s 2025 Africa Cyberthreat Assessment found South Africa had the highest number of ransomware detections among African countries in 2024.
Related: Samsung pop up pub serves bad beer
KineticSkunk positions its service as preventive. The company helps businesses identify gaps while there’s still time to address them. The service is being introduced through reviews and proof-of-concept engagements, often targeting existing clients who already trust the firm’s expertise.
Gallant added that even large companies sometimes overlook this. “They know backup is important, but they may not have considered what happens to the environment or virtual machines if they fail.”
In a market that values speed and innovation, confidence must be built on evidence. Businesses need proof that when systems fail, recovery is possible.
