Network access control remains the first line of defense that zero trust and SASE architectures often overlook.
Businesses adopting secure access service edge (SASE), security service edge (SSE), or zero-trust network access (ZTNA) sometimes assume identity and zero trust alone govern access. Access, however, involves multiple decisions.
What NAC actually does
ZTNA determines whether a user should reach an application. SASE combines networking and security policy for distributed users. Neither addresses a fundamental issue: what connects to the network initially.
Devices may include a managed corporate laptop, a contractor’s device, a printer, camera, or guest phone. NAC intervenes at the connection point to classify devices and enforce access rules before granting network entry.
A hotel analogy illustrates the role. Identity and access management (IAM) functions like a bookings list, tracking expected guests. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) serves as the ID check at reception. ZTNA acts as the keycard reader at each door, restricting access to authorized users. Firewalls monitor movement inside the building. Privileged access management (PAM) provides the master key for restricted areas. NAC, in contrast, decides which key to issue—and which doors it should open.
Most networks extend beyond clean, managed laptops. They include branches, boardrooms, warehouses, clinics, guest Wi-Fi, old hardware, new devices, shared equipment, and machines without assigned users. Some run endpoint agents, while others do not. Some are enrolled in device management, while others remain untouched because they still function.
Related: Rimini Street Posts Quarterly Financial Results
NAC’s visibility becomes essential in these environments. Organizations typically track managed devices well. The difficulty lies in everything else—the printer no one notices until it fails, the smart TV in the cafeteria, a contractor’s laptop, or an old scanner in a remote branch. Unmanaged devices create unmanaged risk.
Why blind spots matter
No security tool eliminates risk completely. The objective is to maintain an acceptable level for the business. NAC helps by clarifying what connects, classifying devices, and applying appropriate access levels instead of treating all network traffic equally.
It also provides SASE and ZTNA with additional context about connecting devices. This reduces gaps around unmanaged and non-user devices. Segmentation becomes more practical when access depends on role, device type, posture, or policy—not static identifiers like a MAC address.
Firewalls remain necessary, but they cannot resolve every admission issue after the fact. If an unknown device is already communicating on the network, the business faces unknown risk. NAC shifts policy enforcement to the connection point, stopping threats before they spread.
For some organizations, NAC strengthens an existing zero-trust approach. For others, it serves as the first step toward one—a way to observe connections, apply policies, reduce unnecessary access, and build a more secure edge without a full overhaul.
The starting point does not always require a new framework. Sometimes, the question is straightforward: who or what connects to the network, and what should they be allowed to do?
